“It’ll be more fun than I’ve ever had on a red carpet.”
Rowlingwould rather do time in Azkaban than refer to transgender women as women.
TheHarry Potterauthor has again voiced her controversial opinions on the transgender community and the use of pronouns.
J.K. Rowling.Bruce Glikas/FilmMagic
In response, she wrote, “No.”
When a commenter seemed to reference a report on theU.K.
“Bring on the court case, I say.
“Hoping for the library, obviously, but I think I could do okay in the kitchen.
Laundry might be a problem.
I have a tendency to shrink stuff/turn it pink accidentally.
Guessing that won’t be an issue if it’s mostly scrubs and sheets, though.”
“If sex isn’t real, there’s no same-sex attraction,” she said at the time.
“If sex isn’t real, the lived reality of women globally is erased.
It isn’t hate to speak the truth.”
“I don’t think this is the forum,” Bloys said.
Our priority is what’s on the screen.
Obviously, the Harry Potter story is incredibly affirmative and positive and about love and self-acceptance.
That’s our priority what’s on screen.”
